Data-Ink and The Dangers of Chart Junk in Information Design

I wrote the following for an internal Edelman blog and thought I'd post it here as well...

“Data-Ink Ratio” is a principle originated and championed by Edward Tufte, the godfather of modern information design. Tufte has been both lauded and vilified for his insistence on minimalism, a philosophy that is at the heart of Data-Ink Ratio.

In short, Data-Ink is the amount of ink (or pixels) devoted to actually communicating information. Any graphics, decorations or text that don’t explicitly communicate one’s story are considered extraneous and unhelpful. So, expressed as a ratio of Data-Ink to total ink, one would want a number as close to “1” as possible. A low Data-Ink ratio of .1 would mean that for every one pixel that communicates your message, nine pixels are wasting space and your audience’s attention.
 
Here’s a simple visual explanation of all that previous ink I just used:
 
The one on the right communicates the same information and does it with less distraction once the gridlines, background and redundant labeling are removed. Here is the leftover “fat,” also termed “Chart Junk” by Tufte, that has been trimmed away:

The Dangers of Decoration

Here are two infographics that I feel are simply overdesigned and filled with chart junk. Yes, they're clever, but does the design aid or hinder a quick reading of the information?
 
 
 
(Credit: Mint.com)
 
Here’s another infographic that has a very simple message, but one that takes longer to process because of the added graphic design. What’s the Data-Ink ratio here? 
 
(Credit: Mashable.com)
 
Finally, I saw this very basic infographic the other day. While I take exception with how some of this data is being manipulated and framed, graphically I think it works quite well. Certainly, I was able to understand the message in mere seconds. High Data-Ink ratio saves the day here!
 (Credit: ThinkProgress.org
Previous
Previous

Buying Presentation Graphics

Next
Next

Does Obama get his Intelligence Briefing on an iPad?